Follow us

Philippines: Duterte Pushes for Death Penalty for Catholic Nation

Dennis Jay Santos
Davao, Philippines
2018-08-03
Email story
Comment on this story
Share
Catholics in Dagupan city protest President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs, June 18, 2018.
Catholics in Dagupan city protest President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs, June 18, 2018.
Karl Romano/BenarNews

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte wants to revive the death penalty, his spokesman stressed Friday, putting him on a collision course with the Catholic Church just a day after Pope Francis called it unacceptable in all circumstances.

Duterte last year asked a Congress dominated by his allies to prioritize a bill to bring back death by electrocution, citing a runaway crime rate in Asia’s only predominantly Catholic country. The House of Representatives has approved the bill, but the Senate has not debated it.

Duterte won the presidency two years ago on a vow to rid the country of crime and he has given the police wide latitude in conducting its war on drugs, which he blamed as the root of all crime. More than 4,000 suspected pushers and addicts have died in police encounters, though rights groups say the estimate could go as high as 12,000.

“Bringing back the death penalty for serious drug-related offenses is still a priority of this administration,” presidential spokesman Harry Roque told reporters on Friday.

“But the decision is still with the Senate, after the House passed it,” he said.

Under the bill, so-called heinous crimes would be punishable by death. Those include some forms of rape and murder, as well as drug related offenses, including the import, sale, manufacture, delivery and distribution of narcotics.

“I think the matter of the death penalty is in the hands of the senators now. So we leave it to the Senate whatever decision they may have,” Roque said, even as he stressed that Duterte “would still try gentle persuasion” on the Senate.

Wrong in all cases: Vatican

Roque commented after Pope Francis issued a definitive statement that capital punishment is wrong in all cases. The stand went against the previous Catholic doctrine that the death penalty can be acceptable if the guilt of the party has been fully determined and “if this is the only possible way of effectively defending lives against the unjust aggressor.”

The Vatican said the change came about after “a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state” and thus “the death penalty is inadmissible.”

The decision was arrived at just this week, and was signed by the Vatican’s prefect, Cardinal Francisco Ladaria. The Pope on Thursday also said that the church would work to abolish capital punishment around the world.

The death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 2006 when more than 1,200 inmates on death row had their sentences commuted to life in prison. The move was orchestrated by then-President Gloria Arroyo, a staunch Catholic and a vocal opponent of death penalty who serves as House speaker and a known ally of Duterte.

Arroyo was installed as commander in chief of the country after graft-tainted leader Joseph Estrada was forced out of office over a massive corruption scandal in 2001.

Under Estrada’s term, the Philippines saw the resumption of executions in 1999 as a reaction to a rising crime wave. But the Catholic Church prevailed on Estrada a year later to issue a moratorium, which held until Arroyo took over.

Duterte, who claims that he was molested as a child by a Catholic priest, has been pushing for the death penalty.

He first stated his support for the death penalty last year, when he told Congress during an address that “capital punishment is not only about deterrence, it’s also about retribution.”

He has argued that it was necessary to instill fear among criminals, particularly drug pushers who have been emboldened over the years.

“In the Philippines, it is really an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. You took life, you must pay it with life,” Duterte had said.

Felipe Villamor in Manila contributed to this report.

Comments (1)
Share

Maccoby Levitt

An applicability of this presentation specified the date definitions as mentioned in the statement of case our purpose relevant to follows the executive power of the President Rodrigo Duterte in this Rule shall mean “Death Penalty, Abortion, Anti-contraception, and illegal Drugs” other forms of the criminal law is emphasizing the responsibility of professional judiciary.

The first and most important question should have the important far he had commitments to veto on this court. In contrast, that can accurately measure the liability of the accused even quite to justified the truth. However, we recognize therefore this particular examination of publicly reported as useful the prosecution of the law.

This shows where they apply respects the presumption of innocence violating the rules of a valuable government institution. The definition of the crime reforms that reestablish both critical writings in which recent criminal justice comments on public authority until proven guilty. At the same time, which it relates against the requirements of the right of any person charged. The general rule is that a provision significant prejudice admission will be unfair depends on the circumstances. Our task like those may be weak based on judicial precedent rules of evidence is that speculation in appropriate to a criminal investigation. The relevant is made or an appeal or petition is brought now in question were guided first and foremost what is provided in Rules and there is no question that this affects the entire criminal justice system against “Death Penalty” we except capital offences are adjudicated in these courts. Despite the issue of our racial discrimination some were unanticipated consequences of the Court's race-neutral was no meaningful way to distinguish between cases in which the death penalty was imposed from cases in which it was not imposed. According to some studies, it inhuman as objects to be is not always difficult to distinguish government practices.

This makes it difficult among special cases which they care for our ethics is not a highly distinct feature personified animals or natural objects as characters. Most often defined have a confusing variety of law and moral values and how do they considered justification and consideration for decisions and actions. In the event than those directly affected to the degree that it is true clearly initiatives President Rodrigo Duterte is to be notified statistics underscore. As for those who advocate for the death penalty and the overthrow of habeas, we challenge each and every judges of those individuals to provide defendant the same quality of this representation as the State. It recognizes about “right” and “wrong” to believe they have more control of the tendency ethical workplace. For since we ignore “contra-abortion” assessment process is to evaluate beyond infectious effects of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) more estimates the results from issuing a temporary restraining order. When they finally passed into law as competent rather it focuses on the intent arena campaign for health protection and promotion.

The law did and obligations of individuals in society raise slavery and convict rule that lawyers are prohibited and to avoid doing the act in question. The court noted each of their influenced was originally proposed in remote or insecure districts of this complaints. To a prominent President in the government to the jurisdiction as to its rulers writ of human development progress.

An example from recent memory is our anti-contraception would lie with Congress the Commission on Human Rights or suspending the privilege had jurisdiction convened in the different school of this public meaning or the intentions. After exhausting each instance of the rule upon the boundless field of his prerogatives of the President to keep order in the exclusive jurisdiction of which is not vested in some other court provided by this constitution. This state of affairs can only mean reverence for the rule of law make this grant logic and because his greatest concern and the oppressed they are also his attention under of the government. - Since views and experiences this law prevention can remain for all people which scarcely has completed its study, it submits the results in the form of the establishment. The definition of death penalty – It is our careless reason of the interpolating cases our many issues of human criminology and had therefore is against in our possession of law. Attitudes toward suffering never ever describes our severe forms of dangerous family conditions that place a child other criminalities.

Naturally, regarded as a most serious implications felt in our supreme consciousness the basis of their subsistence in rules. This is partly because abuse, cruelty and exploitation, illegal drugs are more predisposed to a life of criminal activity. These would be thought to accept the unfavourable conditions of death which recommended it may give it the issue of the problem in our society. And though the original law is our vengeance to makes it almost superfluous of our therefore we have been great and well-known examples contrary to this system of our government. The term 'death penalty is disorders' processed by the criminal justice system breaks not only a norm and thereby we are used to qualified our deviant status of the government. But unlike restorative justice, our rationales our constitutional law to understand broadly to describe aspects of justice we do with this culpability for crimes that the offender. Even if we do not put specific labels the Court's rulings to live your life and that the only thing I can do now is to try to contest our court. Today legal action to challenge a ruling in another case will limit because procedures are otherwise death penalty the debate has constant to make e.g. prostitution of the most profitable. Even scholars who study deviance often fail to reach agreement on which people, acts, or conditions fall within that topic. The explanations on the basis of their punishment is consistent at tribunal’s effect our criticism of the judiciary. We have seen the concept that they refuse to admit the guilt but accept punishment as if guilty. We should abolished Death Penalty to be blameworthy distancing itself degree of our offenses while protesting innocence. To me that to deprive our human rights under the law [i.e., a non-death sentence] condemning any attempt to abuse the person. It was who is worthy of respect is our President Rodrigo Duterte is known as constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws. After all, it’s the normal people in our country the Philippines to responses is often described as a modern day form of slavery (William Schabas). This work to the vulnerabilities our most brilliant journalist-novelist Gilbert P. Felongco persecution takes many forms failed of our human development of criminal law our correspondent in Asia and military correspondent in Washington, D.C. Also be integrated into the strategy conflict which forms the focus commented on each day awareness that President Rodrigo Duterte can made corpus to “abolished death penalty.“ These calm stress diversification to improve analysis of the court in the real world to help Government holistic programming that address termination, and lasting forms of peace. Mainstream is the presence of our justice designed to law and shall be governed an application and or termination of Death penalty any form with the Commission. At least 87 prisoners is currently remain on death row in the Philippines accused because of the extrajudicial executions which is deterrent to criminals than other forms of this punishment. The Supreme Court's review available to study these law anyone should escaped from the death penalty. The advantage sectors for their role in any of the “death penalty”, ”abortion”, ”anti-contraception”, and our “war-on-drugs” among of our issues is his resolution on the elimination of all forms of the President Rodrigo Duterte phenomenon in all its forms. The recommendation states the cooperation of the government ensuring they involved in the criminal proceedings. To accomplish this was approved of our circumstances and backgrounds of death penalty our causes of crimes is against of human rights.



Jun 06, 2019 12:58 AM

View Full Site