China Wins Seat at International Tribunal for Law on the Sea

Drake Long
200825-PH-drake-620.jpg Judges of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea participate in a hearing in Hamburg, Nov. 6, 2013.

China’s candidate has won an election to be a judge on a key United Nations-affiliated agency responsible for hearing cases concerning the Law of the Sea, despite U.S. opposition to what it views as Beijing’s growing influence in international organizations.

Duan Jielong, the Chinese ambassador to Hungary and a law school graduate of Columbia University and China Foreign Affairs University, will sit as one of 21 judges at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). It is the international legal body responsible for adjudicating disputes related to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS.

Duan was nominated by China to represent Asia and won his seat unopposed on Monday, with 149 out of 166 votes gathered among member-states of the tribunal. Seventeen member-states abstained.

“China’s success in the election illustrates once again that [a] certain country’s suppression of the Chinese nominee out of selfish interest is both unwelcome and futile,” China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian said at his daily conference in Beijing, alluding to the United States’ last-minute effort to stop China’s pick from winning.

At a think tank conference on the South China Sea last month, David Stilwell, the top U.S. diplomat for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, said the U.S. was concerned about China’s nomination of its judge to ITLOS and urged other countries to not vote for the candidate.

U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo echoed these concerns at a hearing in the U.S. Senate on July 30 where he requested funding for a special team at the State Department that would push back on China’s growing domination of U.N. agencies and international organizations.

“It’s not just the leaders that matter at these U.N. organizations. They have big bureaucracies underneath them. And we are sadly inadequately represented at every level inside of these international bodies, and it matters,” Pompeo told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

While Pompeo championed the successful U.S. effort to stop China’s preferred pick from winning leadership of another U.N. agency, the World Intellectual Property Organization – the winner was from Singapore – the U.S. had little ability to replicate that in the case of ITLOS.

Since the U.S. has never ratified UNCLOS it is not permitted to submit candidates for any positions in ITLOS. No other candidates from Asian countries were put forth to compete against China’s pick.

Hoang Viet, a professor at Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, pointed out there are “certain advantages” for China in its continuing push to place candidates at international legal forums.

“Psychologically or politically, it is very clear that Vietnam does not like a Chinese candidate to be elected as an ITLOS judge because that thing may cause disadvantages for Vietnam,” he said. “For instance, when ITLOS organizes meetings or discussion, there will only be a Chinese representative to speak Chinese viewpoints, and Vietnam cannot [participate].”

There are 21 members of the tribunal in total. Judges must represent different geographic areas of the world according to the statute that established ITLOS. Five judges represent Asia, and China has held at least one seat on the tribunal since it was created in the mid-1990s. Its current judge, Gao Zhiguo, will end his term on Sept. 30.

Still, China may have limited capacity to control the proceedings of ITLOS in a meaningful way by controlling just a single seat. Of the other tribunal seats, five are held by representatives from Africa, three from Eastern Europe, 4 from Latin America and the Caribbean, three from Western Europe, and one member who can be elected from either Africa, Asia, or Western Europe.

And the tribunal, which is based in Hamburg, isn’t very active. According to its annual report for 2019, it heard just four cases last year, and only made a judgment on one of them.

Julian Ku, a professor at the Hofstra University School of Law in New York, said that although China has only one judge in ITLOS, there is potential for that judge to hold management positions and participate in specific cases China may take an interest in.

“They can form small trial teams to deal with specific disputes. For example, there is a team of 11 judges about disputes over seabed territories,” he said in an interview with Radio Free Asia’s Mandarin-language service, a sister entity of BenarNews.

He added that Chinese officials serving as judges in ITLOS is part of a long-term strategy to control leadership positions in international organizations and ultimately make them less critical of China.

The most consequential court case in recent years concerning the Law of the Sea did not actually happen through ITLOS, but through The Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration.

Through that tribunal, the Philippines challenged the legal basis of China’s expansive claims in the South China Sea, and in 2016 won a landmark award that found China’s claim to “historic rights” over the disputed waterway were invalid. That award set key precedent on what is and is not a valid maritime or territorial claim in the South China Sea under UNCLOS, and has been cited by the Association of Southeast Nations as well as the U.S.

China refused to recognize that award, although the Permanent Court of Arbitration is empowered to hear disputes under Annex VII of UNCLOS. China continues to maintain it has historic rights to the South China Sea even though those claims overlap with those of five other Asian governments, as well as the maritime borders of Indonesia.

The U.S. accuses China of flouting international law and bullying its neighbors – a sentiment echoed this week in a letter from 80 civil society groups from countries around the world. Some groups who signed include the Army of the Republic of Vietnam, Veterans Association in Australia, the Regional Tibetan Youth Congress of Toronto, and the Japan-based South China Sea Issue Consideration Council.

The letter called on the top diplomats of Britain, Japan, and India to “reject China’s arbitrary claims in the South China Sea,” and echo previous statements by the U.S. and Australia rebuking the legality of China’s claims in the disputed waters.


Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.